A white man had his house burnt down, and anti-white racist and black gang graffiti was found at the scene. The graffiti said “Get Out of Town Cracker” and featured symbols of the “Gangster Disciples” a black gang.
Media coverage is really weird, as usual.
(Clarksdale, MS) John King says he’s lost the only home he’s ever owned, possibly due to a hate crime.
On March 22, someone set fire to his Clarksdale home, but not before they spray painted words and symbols all over the walls.
The words “Get Out Cracker” were sprayed on one wall.
Cracker is a derogatory term for white people, and King is white.
The Star of David is sprayed on two walls.
King isn’t Jewish, but that symbol is used by the Gangster Disciples, who are active in Clarksdale.
Why are they explaining “cracker is a derogatory term for white people“, like we don’t know? Like this is something that needs explaining? If it had been “Get Out Nigger” would they explain “nigger is a derogatory term for black people“?
Why do they say “King isn’t Jewish”? They already said he was white. Besides . . . why would we think he was Jewish? Surely it would make more sense that the perpetrators were Jewish? It’s the symbol of a black gang anyway, but I want to talk about this Jewish thing. Putting aside the fact that it’s the symbol of the Gangster Disciples, if it was just a Jewish symbol, wouldn’t that logically suggest it was racist Jews harassing a non-Jew, and leaving their mark? Why would non-Jews burn down a Jew’s house and spray a Jewish symbol? If a Jew’s house was burned down and Christian symbols were sprayed with “Get Out Kike“, the media wouldn’t be saying “he’s not a Christian“, would they? They already called him a cracker, and they were the ones who sprayed the symbol, so why are they telling us he’s not a Jew? Jewish graffiti would imply the people who did it are Jews.